Robert Frost didn't like to explain his poems-and for good reason: to explain a poem is to suck the air from its lungs. This does not mean, however, that poets shouldn't talk about their poetry, or that one shouldn't ask questions about it. Rather, it suggests that any discussion of poetry should celebrate its ultimate ineffability and in so doing lead one to further inquiry. I think of that wonderful scene from Elie Wiesel's memoir, , where Mosche the Beadle of the local synagogue, in dialogue with the young, precocious author, explains: Every question possesses a power that does not lie in the answer.
Robert Frost believed that explaining poetry diminishes its essence, as it takes away the mystery and beauty inherent in the art form. He argued that while poets should engage in discussions about their work, these conversations should reflect poetry's complexity and elusiveness, prompting deeper exploration rather than definitive answers. The essence of poetry lies in its ability to evoke feelings and thoughts that often transcend straightforward explanation.
This perspective resonates with a scene from Elie Wiesel's memoir, where Mosche the Beadle emphasizes the importance of questions over answers. Wiesel's dialogue highlights that the process of introspection and inquiry holds significant value, suggesting that the act of questioning enriches our understanding of both poetry and our own experiences. This approach encourages us to embrace the unknown rather than seek concrete resolutions.