Some caricatures suggest that a conservative would be reluctant to represent a convicted murderer. That may be true, if the client is clearly guilty. Although every defendant deserves a lawyer, I've handled too many horrible criminal cases to have any interest in representing violent criminals. But John Thompson was innocent. And critical to supporting the death penalty is ensuring that we vigorously protect the innocent. DNA has enabled many guilty persons to be convicted, and it has proven the innocence of many others.
In "A Time for Truth: Reigniting the Promise of America," Ted Cruz expresses a nuanced view on representation for those accused of serious crimes. He acknowledges that while every defendant deserves legal counsel, he personally finds it difficult to represent violent criminals due to his experience with horrific cases. This perspective raises questions about the moral obligations of lawyers towards clients who commit egregious acts.
Cruz emphasizes the importance of protecting the innocent, particularly in the context of the death penalty. He points out that advancements in DNA technology have not only provided justice for many wrongfully convicted individuals but have also affirmed the guilt of others. This highlights the critical balance between ensuring justice and maintaining rigorous protections for those who are innocent within the legal system.
