Some of the network graphs that Able Danger produced were twenty feet long and almost wholly unintelligible because the print was so small.8 Krebs himself concluded that there would be no substitute for human intelligence in the war on terrorism; the alternative would be to drown in big data.
Able Danger's network graphs were excessively large, measuring up to twenty feet, and were largely confusing due to the tiny print used. The complexity and size of this data made it difficult to extract meaningful insights, highlighting a significant limitation in relying solely on such methods for intelligence-gathering in the fight against terrorism.
Krebs recognized that human intelligence was irreplaceable and essential in the war against terrorism. Without the intervention of skilled individuals to interpret the vast amounts of data, there was a risk of becoming overwhelmed by information rather than gaining actionable intelligence.
