Stocks passed my e-mail along to Model Gut senior scientist Richard Faulks. Faulks was dismissive not only of extreme chewing, but also of the related fad for blenderizing to increase the accessibility of nutrients. It's true saliva carries an enzyme that breaks down starch, but the pancreas makes this enzyme too. So any digestive slack caused by hasty chewing would be taken up in the small intestine. The human digestive tract has evolved to extract the maximum it can from the food ingested, Faulks said, and that is probably all it needs. Nutritional science is dogged by the idea that if some is good, more is better
(0 Reviews)

In a discussion regarding the recent trend of extreme chewing and blenderizing food to enhance nutrient absorption, Model Gut's senior scientist Richard Faulks expressed skepticism. He argued that while saliva contains enzymes crucial for starch breakdown, the pancreas also produces these enzymes, meaning that any issues caused by inadequate chewing are likely compensated for in the small intestine. Faulks emphasized that the human digestive system is already highly efficient in extracting nutrients from food.

Furthermore, Faulks criticized a common misconception in nutritional science that suggests an increase in nutrient intake inevitably leads to better health. He indicated that the idea that "if some is good, more is better" oversimplifies the complexities of digestion and nutrition. Ultimately, according to Faulks, our digestive system is well-designed to meet our dietary needs without the necessity for extreme chewing or extreme modifications to food.

Categories
Votes
0
Page views
33
Update
April 01, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.
More »

Other quotes in Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal

More »

Popular quotes