...that's the business model. How quickly can they be made to grow, how tightly can they be packed, how much or little can they eat, how sick can they get without dying. This isn't animal experimentation, where you can imagine some proportionate good at the other end of the suffering. This is what we feel like eating... Why doesn't a horny person have as strong a claim to raping an animal as a hungry one does to killing and eating it? It's easy to dismiss that question but hard to respond to it... How riveting wold the sound of a tortured animal need to be to make you want to hear it that badly?
In Jonathan Safran Foer's "Eating Animals," he highlights the stark reality of factory farming, focusing on the practices that maximize productivity and profit at the expense of animal welfare. The text challenges readers to confront how animals are treated, questioning societal norms around eating and the ethical implications of animal suffering. Foer emphasizes the manipulative practices used to ensure rapid growth and survival under harsh conditions, raising questions about the morality of such systems.
Foer provocatively explores the distinctions between human instincts and ethical responsibilities, questioning if there is a moral equivalence in different forms of exploitation, whether for hunger or desire. He invites readers to consider the discomforting notion of animal suffering and challenges them to reflect on the severity of their choices, compelling them to reconsider what it means to eat animals. The narrative encourages deep reflection on personal values in relation to animal rights and consumption habits.
