This quote highlights the often biased perception of film critics based on the production's budget and perceived prestige. It suggests that critics tend to scrutinize or judge big-budget productions more harshly, possibly due to expectations of glamour, spectacle, or commercial success. Conversely, smaller, independent, or student-made films, crafted with limited resources, might not garner the same level of scrutiny but are often appreciated for their authenticity, creativity, and passion. This contrast raises important considerations about the expectations and biases that influence critique in the arts. The disparity underscores the notion that quality and artistic merit are not solely determined by financial investment but also by the depth of storytelling, innovation, and dedication. It prompts us to reflect on whether our evaluations are genuinely about artistic value or are swayed by external factors like budget and production scale. Moreover, the quote encourages a more discerning and equitable approach to evaluating art, recognizing that meaningful and impactful works can come from any level of production. It’s a reminder that cultural and artistic appreciation shouldn't be limited by superficial markers such as funding. Instead, the true essence of art lies in its ability to move, challenge, or inspire audiences regardless of how much was spent to bring it into existence.