The Human Words of God speak of the Creation in terms that could be understood by the men of old. There is no talk of galaxies or genes, for such terms would have confused them greatly! But must we therefore take as scientific fact the story that the world was created in six days, thus making a nonsense of observable data?
In "The Year of the Flood" by Margaret Atwood, the author reflects on how ancient texts describe creation in a way that aligns with the understanding of people from their time. The language used avoids complex scientific concepts, such as galaxies or genes, which would have been alien to those audiences. Instead, these narratives communicate the essence of creation in simpler terms.
Atwood questions whether we should accept these ancient accounts as literal truth, particularly regarding the notion of a six-day creation. She suggests that doing so could conflict with observable scientific evidence, prompting a reevaluation of how these texts should be interpreted in light of modern understanding.
