to admit we do not understand a phenomenon is not to admit the presence of the miraculous but merely, reasonably, to accept the limitations of human knowledge. God was invented to explain what our ancestors couldn't comprehend: the radiant mystery of being. The existence of the incomprehensible, however, is not a proof of god.

πŸ“– Salman Rushdie

🌍 Indian  |  πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό Novelist

πŸŽ‚ June 19, 1947
(0 Reviews)

In "The Ground Beneath Her Feet," Salman Rushdie explores the boundaries of human understanding and the tendency to invoke divine explanations for the unknown. He argues that acknowledging our limitations does not equate to recognizing the miraculous; instead, it reflects our rational acceptance of the gaps in our knowledge. This notion suggests that the quest for understanding often leads to the creation of ideas about God to fill these gaps. However, the mere existence of mysteries in life does not substantiate the existence of a deity.

Rushdie emphasizes that humanity's historical attempts to comprehend the world are often rooted in the desire to explain the inexplicable. He believes that while the complexities of existence may prompt the invention of God, it is crucial to recognize that the incomprehensible does not automatically confirm divine existence. Understanding the difference between a lack of explanation and evidence of a higher power fosters a more nuanced view of knowledge and belief.

Page views
1
Update
April 09, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.