One thing that distinguishes autocrats from contemporary democratic leaders is their intolerance to criticism and the willingness to use their power to punish those who - in opposition, in the media or in civil society - to criticize them.
Autocrats are often characterized by their inability to accept criticism, which sets them apart from modern democratic leaders. They frequently respond to dissenting voices with hostility, using their authority to suppress opposition, silence the media, and stifle civil society. This intolerance creates an environment where free expression is severely restricted, and fear of retribution discourages open dialogue.
In contrast, democratic leaders typically embrace criticism as part of a healthy political discourse. They understand that dissent can strengthen democracy and encourage accountability. The difference in how leaders react to opposition not only shapes their governance style but also impacts the overall health and resilience of their political systems.
