Wallen, like Masters and Johnson, thinks it's possible that a majority of the so-called vaginal orgasms being had during intercourse are in reality clitoral orgasms. But unlike Masters and Johnson, he doesn't suggest that most women are having them easily. He believes, like Bonaparte, that the women having them-the paraclitoridiennes of the world-are an anatomically distinct group whose sexual response is different from that of the majority of women. And that maybe these women are where the whole notion of the vaginal orgasm originally came from.
Wallen, similar to the researchers Masters and Johnson, posits that many vaginal orgasms experienced during intercourse may actually be clitoral orgasms. However, he differs in his view, suggesting that not all women achieve these orgasms easily. He aligns with Bonaparte's theory, proposing that women who do experience these orgasms—referred to as paraclitoridiennes—are part of a unique anatomical group with a distinct sexual response.
This perspective indicates that the concept of the vaginal orgasm might have originated from the experiences of this smaller group of women, emphasizing that the majority may not share the same sexual response. Wallen's observations suggest a need to rethink previously held beliefs about female orgasm and its complexities.
