We should measure welfare's success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.
This quote emphasizes the importance of evaluating social welfare programs based on their effectiveness in empowering individuals to achieve independence, rather than solely focusing on the number of people receiving assistance. It suggests that true success lies in reducing dependency, fostering self-sufficiency, and enabling people to improve their economic and social circumstances. When analyzing welfare policies, the key metric should be how many individuals are able to transition out of assistance because they have gained stability—be it through employment, education, or community support—rather than simply counting how many are currently enrolled.
The perspective calls for a shift from viewing welfare as a permanent fixture or safety net to seeing it as a bridge toward self-reliance. This approach encourages policymakers to evaluate programs not only on their reach but also on their long-term impact. The underlying notion stresses that welfare, when effectively administered, should serve as a stepping stone rather than an endpoint. It aligns with principles of empowerment and personal achievement.
Furthermore, focusing on exit rates from welfare programs promotes the idea that social systems should prioritize creating opportunities for independence—such as job training, education, and supportive services—so that beneficiaries can stand on their own feet. It also raises questions about the quality and sustainability of welfare programs, pushing for measures that foster self-growth rather than transient assistance.
In a broader sense, this quote advocates for policies that aim for upward mobility — recognizing that the ultimate goal is not merely to provide aid but to facilitate a pathway out of poverty and dependency. It underscores the importance of measuring success in terms of positive outcomes and transformative impact, rather than raw figures of aid recipients.