Yet surely she was as culpable as he was; recalling her casual speculation about when Jasper's wife's grandmother might die and thereby free Jasper and Susan to divorce, Liz wondered if a stronger sign of a relationship's essential corruptness could exist than for its official realization to hinge on the demise of another human being.
In the narrative, the character Liz contemplates her own moral responsibility in a complex love triangle. She reflects on a previous thought she had regarding the timing of a death that would allow two people to be together, questioning the ethics of such an idea. This introspection leads her to realize that the relationship between Jasper and Susan is fundamentally flawed, as it rests on the tragic condition of another person's passing. Liz's realization highlights the darker side of their romantic entanglement, suggesting that the bond formed under these circumstances can be considered corrupt. The notion that love can depend on the end of a life raises significant ethical questions about the nature of their feelings and intentions, ultimately leading Liz to reassess her views on culpability and the integrity of relationships.
In the narrative, the character Liz contemplates her own moral responsibility in a complex love triangle. She reflects on a previous thought she had regarding the timing of a death that would allow two people to be together, questioning the ethics of such an idea. This introspection leads her to realize that the relationship between Jasper and Susan is fundamentally flawed, as it rests on the tragic condition of another person's passing.
Liz's realization highlights the darker side of their romantic entanglement, suggesting that the bond formed under these circumstances can be considered corrupt. The notion that love can depend on the end of a life raises significant ethical questions about the nature of their feelings and intentions, ultimately leading Liz to reassess her views on culpability and the integrity of relationships.
