In "It Can't Happen Here" by Sinclair Lewis, a character provocatively questions a military general about the idea of peace versus the realities of societal challenges. They depict a scenario where a nation's obsession with wealth leads to a disparity fueled by labor unions and misguided financial policies, suggesting that those who are industrious are burdened to support the irresponsible. The speaker challenges the general to admit, even in a private setting among Rotarians, that perhaps war could serve as a means to invigorate the 'lazy' elements of society.

This dialogue reflects a deeper commentary on the socioeconomic issues of the time, where the speaker insinuates that drastic measures, like war, might be seen as justifiable to address the failures of certain segments of the populace. The phrase “money-mad” critiques the overwhelming focus on wealth and its impact on social dynamics, while the rhetorical question invites the general to reconsider his stance on peace in the face of such societal flaws. Through this exchange, Lewis explores the tension between idealism and the harsh realities of political and social life.