almost all of the shtetl's three hundred–odd citizens had gathered to debate that about which they knew nothing. The less a citizen knew, the more adamantly he or she argued. There was nothing new in this. A month before there had been the question of whether it might send a better message to the children to plug, finally, the bagel's hole.
In the shtetl, nearly all three hundred residents assembled to discuss a topic they lacked expertise in, showcasing the irony of their situation. Those who were least informed tended to speak the loudest and assert their opinions most vigorously. This scenario wasn't unique; it mirrored past debates where strong opinions were voiced about trivial matters, like whether the hole in a bagel should be sealed for a more appealing message to the younger generation.
This behavior reflects a broader commentary on human nature and community dynamics—where uncertainty and ignorance often fuel passionate discourse. The inhabitants, despite their lack of knowledge, engage deeply in discussions, revealing a common trait among people to stake their claims on subjects they may not fully understand.
