As another philosopher, Myisha Cherry, has recently argued, I want to convince you that there are types of anger that are not bad. In particular, she is interested in anger at injustice, regarding it as a wholly appropriate response to inequity. Here are some of the features of the anger at injustice: it recognizes wrongdoing. This recognition is not mistaken; this person is not delusional or making this up in their head. It is not selfish. So when someone is angry at injustice they're not just concerned with themselves but also other people . . . this anger does not violate other people's rights and most importantly, it desires change.9
Myisha Cherry, a philosopher, suggests that not all forms of anger are negative, particularly emphasizing anger directed at injustice. This type of anger is considered a legitimate reaction to unfairness and serves as a catalyst for social change. It is based on a clear recognition of wrongdoing, indicating that the individual perceives the situation accurately rather than harboring delusions.
Moreover, anger at injustice is characterized by an altruistic mindset; it is motivated not by self-interest but by a concern for others affected by inequality. This form of anger respects the rights of others and is constructive, aiming to foster change rather than perpetuate harm. Thus, it highlights the potential of anger as a powerful force for justice when it is rooted in a genuine response to societal issues.
