As they walked through Calcutta, a beggar approached them, pleading for money. While Mike continued without giving, Mitchell paused to contribute a small amount. This interaction highlights the differing perspectives on charity between the two characters. Mike reflects on his initial generosity, which faded as he recognized the futility of such acts, suggesting a sense of disillusionment with the situation of poverty.

Mitchell, on the other hand, maintains his conviction to help those in need, citing Jesus' teachings on giving. This exchange illustrates a conflict between idealism and realism, as Mike doubts the effectiveness of compassion in the face of overwhelming despair, while Mitchell clings to his moral beliefs despite the harsh realities of Calcutta.