Bernal thought that discipline was a crucial element for achieving a revolution. He believed that having a structured, organized approach was necessary to bring about significant change. His view emphasized order and control as vital components for success in revolutionary efforts.

On the other hand, Wiley held the opposite belief, suggesting that strict discipline was not required for revolution. He likely believed that spontaneity or flexibility might be more effective or that rigid discipline could hinder revolutionary movements. These differing perspectives highlight contrasting approaches to activism and change.