Dogma gives a charter to mistake, but the very breath of science is a contest with mistake, and must keep the conscience alive.
In "Middlemarch," George Eliot articulates a profound distinction between dogma and science. He suggests that dogma, which is rigid and fixed in its beliefs, can inadvertently endorse errors by providing a framework that discourages questioning or critical thought. This reliance on established notions can lead to stagnation and the perpetuation of mistakes.
Conversely, Eliot emphasizes that science thrives on the challenge of correcting errors. It embodies a dynamic process of inquiry that constantly refreshes our understanding and keeps our moral and intellectual conscience active. Through this contest with mistakes, science pushes us to grow and learn, fostering a culture of curiosity and responsibility.