In Iain M. Banks' novel "Inversions," a poignant question is raised about the expectations placed on women regarding their resistance to advances, even from those they might willingly submit to. This commentary highlights the societal issue where women's unwillingness to aggressively resist can be interpreted as consent, creating ambiguity about their true feelings and intentions.

This complexity is particularly troubling when considering more severe violations. If women are conditioned to resist even those interactions they might enjoy or desire, how can men discern if any signs of protest are genuine, or simply a facade? This confusion complicates the dynamics of consent and highlights the need for clearer communication in relationships.