For the minister, who was far from considering himself a radical on questions of ethics, not all scoundrels were equal; their degree of social acceptability stood in direct relation to each individual's fortune and distinction-especially if, in exchange for that minor moral violation on the minister's part, large material benefits were to be obtained.

(0 Reviews)

The minister in "The Fencing Master" by Arturo Pérez-Reverte reveals a nuanced perspective on morality and ethics. He considers not all wrongdoers to be equally culpable, suggesting that their social acceptance is significantly influenced by their wealth and status. This indicates a moral hierarchy where the upper class is often forgiven more minor transgressions due to their societal contributions or the advantages they provide in return.

This viewpoint highlights a pragmatic approach to ethics, where the potential for material gain can overshadow moral concerns. The minister's justification of minor violations in exchange for substantial benefits underscores a theme of hypocrisy within social and ethical standards, questioning the very nature of morality in the context of power and privilege.

Page views
1
Update
March 08, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.