For the minister, who was far from considering himself a radical on questions of ethics, not all scoundrels were equal; their degree of social acceptability stood in direct relation to each individual's fortune and distinction-especially if, in exchange for that minor moral violation on the minister's part, large material benefits were to be obtained.
The minister in "The Fencing Master" by Arturo Pérez-Reverte reveals a nuanced perspective on morality and ethics. He considers not all wrongdoers to be equally culpable, suggesting that their social acceptance is significantly influenced by their wealth and status. This indicates a moral hierarchy where the upper class is often forgiven more minor transgressions due to their societal contributions or the advantages they provide in return.
This viewpoint highlights a pragmatic approach to ethics, where the potential for material gain can overshadow moral concerns. The minister's justification of minor violations in exchange for substantial benefits underscores a theme of hypocrisy within social and ethical standards, questioning the very nature of morality in the context of power and privilege.
