He looks at Norris, exasperated. He seems to think that with eloquence, with sincerity, with frankness, he can change what is happening. The whole court has seen him slobbering over the queen. How could he expect to go shopping with his eyes, and finger the goods no doubt, and not have an account to settle at the end of it?
The character’s frustration is evident as he observes Norris, feeling that mere words and honesty won't alter the reality of their situation. Norris's previous actions, particularly his overt affection for the queen, have not gone unnoticed by the court, which adds to the tension. This suggests that reputations are fragile, and one cannot simply erase past missteps through eloquent declarations alone.
Furthermore, the metaphor of shopping implies a transactional nature to relationships and actions in the court. Just as one must pay for goods, he believes that Norris must face the consequences of his behavior. The text highlights the interplay of power, desire, and accountability in a politically charged environment, where every action is scrutinized and has repercussions.
