I want to see the whole picture - as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good' and 'bad', and limit my vision. If I used the term 'good' on a thing I'd lose my license to inspect it, because there might be bad in it. Don't you see? I want to be able to look at the whole thing.
In "In Dubious Battle," John Steinbeck articulates a desire for a comprehensive understanding of situations, free from simplistic labels. The narrator expresses a determination to see the entire picture rather than succumbing to the limitations of categorizing experiences as purely 'good' or 'bad'. This perspective encourages a more nuanced view of the complexities inherent in life.
Steinbeck suggests that labeling something as 'good' could blind someone to its negatives, thereby impairing their ability to investigate and reflect on it thoroughly. Emphasizing the importance of a holistic view, he implies that a true understanding comes from acknowledging both positive and negative aspects without bias, allowing for deeper insights into human experiences and social issues.
