I was condemned to be burnt myself recently, or my books were. An article in the _Catholic Herald_ said that my _His Dark Materials_ was far more worthy of the bonfire than Harry {Potter}; it was a million times more sinister. Naturally, I'm very proud of this distinction, and I asked the publishers to print it in the paperback of _The Subtle Knife_.
In a recent controversy, Philip Pullman reflected on criticism of his work, particularly his novel _His Dark Materials_. He mentioned that some believe his writing deserves to be condemned or even burned, just like Harry Potter, but to a greater degree. An article in the _Catholic Herald_ characterized his work as considerably more sinister than that of J.K. Rowling's series, which has sparked debate. Pullman takes pride in this negative distinction, showcasing his confidence in the impact of his storytelling.
Embracing the controversy surrounding his work, Pullman requested that the critical remark be included in the paperback edition of his book, _The Subtle Knife_. This move highlights his attitude towards criticism, suggesting that he values the robust discussions his books provoke. The notion of being targeted for censorship further emphasizes the significance and boldness of his literature in the realm of storytelling.
