It is possible that the distinction between moral relativism and moral absolutism has sometimes been blurred because an excessively consistent practice of either leads to the same practical result-ruthlessness in political life.
The concept of moral relativism and moral absolutism has often been intertwined, as consistently adhering to either perspective can produce similarly harsh outcomes in political contexts. Both extremes can foster a lack of compassion and an unyielding approach to governance, leading to ruthlessness in decision-making. This observation highlights the dangers of adhering too rigidly to a single moral perspective without considering the complexities of human behavior and societal needs.
Richard Hofstadter, in his book "The Age of Reform," points out that the consequences of strictly following moral principles—whether relative or absolute—can blur the lines between them. The implication is that a nuanced understanding of morality is essential to avoid the pitfalls of extreme views, as both can result in an uncompromising attitude towards others, undermining the ethical foundations of political life.
