The narrator reflects on the nature of coincidences, suggesting that by separating them, they may seem more believable. However, the speaker expresses indifference towards whether others believe these coincidences because they are inherently true. There’s a struggle to define the line between coincidence and intentional outcomes in life.

When one desires something and ultimately receives it, such as a job or a sandwich, the speaker challenges the notion that these outcomes are mere coincidences. If individuals possess any agency over their lives, then these occurrences are influenced by their desires rather than being random happenstances.