This passage from '( A Guile of Dragons )' by James Enge explores the complex nature of deception and genuine cooperation. At first glance, the idea that a group of dragons might simply be honest in their intent challenges the common perception of such mythical creatures as inherently cunning and deceitful. Deor’s suggestion implies that what appears as a straightforward raid might lack any underlying deceit—perhaps the dragons are straightforward in their motives. However, the subsequent reflection underscores a deeper truth: when individuals or groups decide to feign cooperation, they are engaging in a form of deception that can be more insidious than outright guile. Pretending to work together requires effort, strategy, and constant maintenance of appearances, which can become more exhausting and dishonest than simply performing in a straightforward manner. This highlights a fundamental aspect of human and non-human interactions—sometimes the act of pretending to be honest or cooperative can obscure the true motives and intentions better than transparent deception. It also raises questions about trust, authenticity, and the cost of deception. In social, political, or personal contexts, choosing to pretend or deceive can create a fragile facade that, if broken, might lead to even greater chaos or betrayal. Enge prompts us to consider whether honesty, even if imperfect, might be preferable to the intricate and often damaging layers of pretension, especially when cooperation is required.

Understanding this dynamic enables a more nuanced view of interactions—whether among mythical creatures or humans—and reminds us that the true nature of cooperation and deception is often complicated, layered, and consequential.