The passage highlights a stark contrast between two types of men: the hard and cruel individual versus the kind-hearted one. It suggests that those who act with cruelty will face scorn and mockery after their death, as their harsh actions are remembered unfavorably. In contrast, a man who is kind and compassionate will earn admiration and positive recognition even from strangers, leaving a legacy that transcends his immediate surroundings.

This idea emphasizes the enduring impact of kindness over cruelty, asserting that a gentle and caring nature is ultimately more celebrated. While the harsh man may hold power and inflict suffering during his life, his legacy is tainted, whereas the kind man's positive deeds resonate long after he is gone, earning him respect and praise from people far and wide.