Pilon complained, It is not a good story. There are too many meanings and too many lessons in it. Some of those lessons are opposite. There is not a story to take into your head. It proves nothing.I like it said Pablo. I like it because it hasn't any meaning you can see, and still it does seem to mean something, I can't tell what.
Pilon expresses his dissatisfaction with a story he finds overly complex, claiming it contains too many meanings and conflicting lessons. He suggests that the narrative is unstructured and lacks a clear message that one can easily grasp or internalize, leading him to conclude that it ultimately proves nothing. His critique reflects a desire for stories that offer straightforward lessons.
On the other hand, Pablo appreciates the story for its ambiguity, viewing its lack of a definite meaning as a strength. He enjoys the mystery it presents, feeling that even without explicit interpretation, there is an underlying significance that resonates. This contrast highlights differing perspectives on literary value, with one valuing clarity and the other embracing complexity and ambiguity.
