Pilon expresses his dissatisfaction with a story he finds overly complex, claiming it contains too many meanings and conflicting lessons. He suggests that the narrative is unstructured and lacks a clear message that one can easily grasp or internalize, leading him to conclude that it ultimately proves nothing. His critique reflects a desire for stories that offer straightforward lessons.
On the other hand, Pablo appreciates the story for its ambiguity, viewing its lack of a definite meaning as a strength. He enjoys the mystery it presents, feeling that even without explicit interpretation, there is an underlying significance that resonates. This contrast highlights differing perspectives on literary value, with one valuing clarity and the other embracing complexity and ambiguity.