Political judgments are generally vain formalities, for the same passions which give rise to the accusation ordain the condemnation. Such is the atrocious logic of revolutions.
In "Twenty Years After," Alexandre Dumas reflects on the inherent futility of political judgments. He suggests that these judgments often serve as empty rituals rather than meaningful assessments. The very emotions that lead to accusations in political contexts typically dictate the outcome, creating a cycle of condemnation that lacks true justice or fairness.
Dumas critiques the irrational nature of revolutions, highlighting that they manifest a flawed logic. The fervor and fervent passions that ignite societal change frequently lead to unjust outcomes, as the same motives fueling the desires for change often spiral into accusations and guilt, reinforcing a repetitive cycle of conflict and retribution.
