That technology has canceled geography contains just enough merit to be called a plausible fallacy
In "The Revenge Of Geography," Robert D. Kaplan explores the idea that while technology has significantly transformed communication and interaction, it has not fully eradicated the importance of geography. He discusses how geographical factors continue to shape political and social dynamics, impacting global conflicts and power structures. The assertion that technology has nullified geographical boundaries is seen as overly simplistic, as the realities of land, resources, and climate still play crucial roles in decision-making and strategy.
Kaplan argues that understanding geography is essential for anticipating global trends and conflicts, suggesting that technology cannot substitute the fundamental influences of physical space. The interplay between geography and human behavior remains relevant, reminding us that despite technological advancements, we are still intrinsically linked to the geographical contexts in which we exist. As such, geography continues to wield significant influence in shaping our future, illustrating the limitation of viewing technology as a complete replacement for geographical factors.
