that there is no reason he should grieve. He will perhaps say it was too early for me to leave for the forest. But even if affection should prevent me from leaving my family just now of my own accord, in due course death would tear us apart, and in that we would have no say. Birds settle on a tree for a while, and then go their separate ways again. The meeting of all living beings must likewise inevitably end in their parting. This world passes away and disappoints the hopes of everlasting attachment. It is therefore unwise to have a sense of ownership for people who are united with us as in a dream-for a short while only and not in fact.3
In this passage, the author reflects on the transient nature of relationships and life itself. One may feel sorrow for leaving loved ones, but ultimately, the inevitability of death means that separation will come regardless. The comparison of birds resting on a tree illustrates the temporary bonds we share with one another, highlighting that all encounters are fleeting.
The text suggests that forming a deep sense of ownership over these connections is misguided. It emphasizes that life is filled with impermanence, and clinging too tightly to relationships can lead to disappointment when they inevitably change. Understanding this can help mitigate grief, as the nature of existence involves continual parting and loss.
