The Constitution was intended less to resolve arguments than to make argument itself the solution.

The Constitution was intended less to resolve arguments than to make argument itself the solution.

(0 Reviews)

In "The Quartet: Orchestrating the Second American Revolution, 1783-1789," Joseph J. Ellis presents the idea that the Constitution was designed to foster discussions and debates rather than to provide clear-cut resolutions to conflicts. This approach emphasizes the belief that the strength of a democratic society lies in its ability to engage in dialogue and navigate disagreements through argumentation.

Ellis's analysis suggests that the founders recognized the importance of creating a system where differing opinions could emerge and be addressed through rational debate. By prioritizing argument as a means of governance, they paved the way for a more dynamic political landscape, allowing the nation to evolve and adapt over time.

Page views
600
Update
October 01, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.