The Constitution was intended less to resolve arguments than to make argument itself the solution.

(0 Reviews)

In "The Quartet: Orchestrating the Second American Revolution, 1783-1789," Joseph J. Ellis presents the idea that the Constitution was designed to foster discussions and debates rather than to provide clear-cut resolutions to conflicts. This approach emphasizes the belief that the strength of a democratic society lies in its ability to engage in dialogue and navigate disagreements through argumentation.

Ellis's analysis suggests that the founders recognized the importance of creating a system where differing opinions could emerge and be addressed through rational debate. By prioritizing argument as a means of governance, they paved the way for a more dynamic political landscape, allowing the nation to evolve and adapt over time.

Page views
46
Update
January 26, 2025

Rate the Quote

Add Comment & Review

User Reviews

Based on 0 reviews
5 Star
0
4 Star
0
3 Star
0
2 Star
0
1 Star
0
Add Comment & Review
We'll never share your email with anyone else.