The practitioners of 'dry' art admire myth and symbol, precision and coherence; they would, theoretically, be more excited by an interpretation of one of Shakespeare's plays which offered them a beautifully plotted, 'containing' framework of themes and recurrent symbols, than by one which placed its main emphasis on Shakespeare's skill in reproducing the accidental, the idiosyncratic happenings of life, or his power to arouse in the audience an immediate emotional attachment to Falstaff.
The practitioners of 'dry' art value clarity, structure, and the cohesive use of symbols and themes in artistic interpretation. They would find greater satisfaction in a well-organized analysis of a Shakespeare play that connects motifs and provides a logical framework, rather than one that focuses on the unpredictable elements of life or the emotional connections elicited from characters like Falstaff. This aesthetic preference emphasizes order over spontaneity.
In essence, these critics appreciate interpretations that highlight intentional design and artistic precision. To them, the beauty of art lies in the thoughtful arrangement of its components rather than the chaotic nuances of real life. This perspective reflects a desire for a deeper understanding of themes, where everything fits neatly into a conceptual whole, rather than being swayed by emotional responses or the complexity of human experiences.
