The Russian delegation, headed by Maxim Litvinov, advocated for total and prompt disarmament among all nations. Their proposal was quickly dismissed, as it was perceived as a deceptive tactic by the Bolsheviks. This refusal highlights the prevailing suspicion and tension in international relations during that time, particularly towards Russian intentions. The rejection of the disarmament proposal reflects the broader context of distrust among nations following the upheavals of World War I and the rise of Bolshevism. Many countries were wary of the Soviet Union's motives and feared that disarming would leave them vulnerable. This incident underscores the complexities and challenges surrounding arms control and diplomacy during the interwar period.

The Russian delegation, headed by Maxim Litvinov, advocated for total and prompt disarmament among all nations. Their proposal was quickly dismissed, as it was perceived as a deceptive tactic by the Bolsheviks. This refusal highlights the prevailing suspicion and tension in international relations during that time, particularly towards Russian intentions.

The rejection of the disarmament proposal reflects the broader context of distrust among nations following the upheavals of World War I and the rise of Bolshevism. Many countries were wary of the Soviet Union's motives and feared that disarming would leave them vulnerable. This incident underscores the complexities and challenges surrounding arms control and diplomacy during the interwar period.