The text discusses the distinction between phenomena accepted on faith and those validated through objective evidence. It highlights that while both types of understanding may have rational explanations, societal attitudes toward them vary significantly. People often express skepticism towards sensory evidence and commonly witnessed phenomena, while fiercely defending beliefs without personal experience.

The author suggests that faith possesses a strength similar to that of scientific validation, but it also carries greater risks. This comparison emphasizes the potential dangers of unwavering belief without empirical support, contrasting it with the methodical nature of scientific inquiry.