There is no discussing theology, sociology and politics when someone is under the spell of a self-enclosed totalitarian ideology. Intentionally or out of ignorance, Ahmed, who is empirical in all matters, detests pointless and laborious philosophical imaginings, never-ending discussions, or clashes of ideas that might be respectful of non-believer opponents and sinners deserving only of complete contempt.
In Elie Wiesel's book "Hostage," the character Ahmed embodies a critical view of discussions surrounding theology, sociology, and politics. He perceives engaging in dialogue while someone is firmly entrenched in a totalitarian ideology to be futile. Whether due to a deliberate choice or lack of understanding, Ahmed holds a strong disdain for what he sees as fruitless philosophical debates or ideological conflicts that fail to recognize the dignity of opponents, particularly those he regards as non-believers or sinners.
The narrative illustrates Ahmed's empirical approach to life, emphasizing practicality over abstract reasoning. His rejection of prolonged discussions reflects a belief that certain ideologies do not warrant respectful discourse, especially when they, in his view, lead to contempt and conflict. Wiesel’s exploration of these themes presents a critical lens on how oppressive ideologies can stifle meaningful interaction and reduce complex human relationships to mere antagonism.
