This is precisely the kind of critical turnabout that has always frustrated and infuriated architects. No less a figure than Sir Christopher Wren, writing tow hundred years earlier, complained that the peoples of London may despise some eyesore until it is demolished, whereupon by magick the replacement is deemed inferior to the former edifice, now eulogized in high and glowing reference.
The passage reflects the ongoing frustration architects experience when their works are judged over time. Historical figures like Sir Christopher Wren have voiced similar sentiments, noting how public opinion can shift dramatically regarding buildings. Structures once considered unsightly can become revered once they are no longer present. This phenomenon leads to a sense of irony and disappointment for those involved in architecture.
This critical attitude reveals the complex relationship between society and its built environment. The fleeting nature of admiration can cause innovators to feel disheartened, as their efforts may be undervalued in favor of past designs that are nostalgically idealized once replaced. Such perceptions underscore the need for a deeper understanding and appreciation of architectural contributions in the modern world.
