This segregation is confirmed by the common stereotypes of these two disciplines and their representatives. While scientists are perceived as absentminded, casually dressed individuals who live in a refined world of abstract theory with little practical reality, lawyers are usually perceived as formally dressed people who are practically oriented, concentrating mainly on trivialities {such as negotiating their retaining fee} and engaging professionally in all sorts of nitty-gritty social intercourse-the kind of things that normal people, although worried by them, would rather not have to deal with themselves.
The text discusses the contrasting perceptions associated with scientists and lawyers, highlighting the stereotypes that define their respective roles. Scientists are often seen as eccentric, casual thinkers engrossed in abstract theories, seemingly detached from practical concerns. This portrayal emphasizes a kind of intellectualism that prioritizes theory over real-world application.
In contrast, lawyers are depicted as formal and practical, focused on the minutiae of legal matters and social negotiations. This stereotype suggests they engage in tedious specifics that the general public would prefer to avoid, reflecting a more pragmatic approach to their profession. Together, these perceptions illustrate a broader societal division between the abstract world of science and the concrete realities confronted by legal professionals.
