This quote offers a sobering reflection on human nature and social interaction. It suggests that societal norms like discretion or privacy may largely be conditioned by the understanding that many individuals are primarily self-interested. In a way, this insight can be both liberating and disheartening. On one hand, recognizing that others are often focused on their own lives might free us from feelings of guilt or obligation to constantly cater to others' expectations. It can foster a sense of independence, reducing the emotional toll of feeling responsible for perceived social inappropriateness or vulnerability. On the other hand, this perspective exposes a rather cynical view of human relationships. It implies that genuine concern, empathy, and community might be scarce commodities, driven more by self-interest than altruism. Such a realization can shift how we perceive interactions—from sincere exchanges to strategic or superficial dealings. This understanding could lead to a more pragmatic approach to relationships, emphasizing self-protection and cautiousness. However, it also risks fostering alienation, as it challenges the notion of authentic human connection. Despite its potentially bleak tone, this quote invites reflection on how societal values shape our behaviors and whether our acts of kindness and openness are truly spontaneous or motivated by an awareness of self-interest. Recognizing these dynamics doesn't have to lead to cynicism but can serve as a foundation for approaching relationships with appropriate boundaries yet maintaining a core of genuine compassion.