The passage raises a question about how one might articulate a belief in the superiority of intelligence over the natural process of evolution, which relies heavily on mutation and survival of the fittest. It suggests that this conventional understanding of evolution is limited, implying that intelligence offers a more refined perspective on existence.

Moreover, the text contrasts the often brutal nature of competition in the wild with the potential for conscious cooperation among individuals. This idea highlights that collaboration can lead to more effective outcomes than the aggressive rivalry that characterizes much of evolutionary theory, suggesting a shift in thinking about progress and success in society.