Mr. Rasmussen expresses frustration over the League of Nations, questioning its purpose if it is primarily under the control of Great Britain and its colonies. Eveline counters his negativity by suggesting that any form of organization is preferable to having none at all. This dialogue reveals a tension between idealism and realism, highlighting differing perspectives on governance and global cooperation.

Robbins, however, injects a dose of cynicism into the conversation, emphasizing that the effectiveness of a league depends not on its title, but on the underlying power dynamics. The California woman's response to his cynicism reflects a belief that optimism is crucial in challenging times. Yet Robbins insists that maintaining a cynical outlook is essential for coping with reality, suggesting a deeper commentary on the disillusionment wrought by the post-war climate.