By contrast, a social policy agenda that sets aside stiff means testing in favor of the more universalistic models found in northern Europe could have a moderating effect on our politics. Social policies that benefit everyone-Social Security and Medicare are prime examples-could help diminish resentment, build bridges across large swaths of the American electorate, and lock into place social support for more durable policies to reduce income inequality-without providing the raw materials for racially motivated backlash.
The author, Steven Levitsky, contrasts the traditional means-tested social policies in the U.S. with the more universal social welfare models seen in Northern Europe. He suggests that adopting these universal policies could soften political tensions and foster a more cohesive society. By ensuring that benefits like social security and Medicare are available to all, it could cultivate empathy and understanding among diverse groups within the American electorate.
Levitsky argues that such an approach might not only reduce income inequality but also prevent the divisive backlash that can arise from targeted welfare programs. Universal social policies can build a stronger foundation for stable governance by encouraging a sense of shared responsibility and communal support, ultimately leading to a more harmonious society.