Clearly, boxing's very image is repulsive to many people because it cannot be assimilated into what we wish to know about civilized man. In a technological society possessed of incalculably refined methods of mass destruction {consider how many times over the United States and the Soviet Union have vaporized each other in fantasy} boxing's display of direct unmitigated and seemingly natural aggression is too explicit to be tolerated.
Boxing often provokes negative reactions due to its affinity with raw violence, which conflicts with modern ideals of civility. In a world where technology supports advanced methods of warfare, the straightforward brutality of boxing stands out as unsettling. The sport’s inherent aggression is too overt and cannot easily align with the civilized image we strive to uphold.
Moreover, this clash between traditional sportsmanship and contemporary societal values creates a divide. People are frequently uncomfortable with boxing because it sensationalizes physical conflict in a way that feels outdated amidst advanced societal norms. Ultimately, this reflects deeper concerns about how we reconcile human aggression within a civilized framework.
