Hitler, Mussolini, and Chávez, despite their distinct ideologies and contexts, shared notable pathways to power. They were all considered outsiders who possessed a unique ability to engage and mobilize public sentiment. This charisma played a significant role in their ascents, as they managed to connect with the frustrations of the populace while capitalizing on the failures of existing political figures.

Their rises can be attributed to a critical oversight by the political establishment. In some cases, like with Hitler and Mussolini, established leaders actively surrendered power, while Chávez benefited from a political environment that unwittingly facilitated his rise. This pattern indicates a vulnerability within democracies where leaders can emerge from the fringes when established politicians fail to heed potential threats.