In "Dragonfly in Amber," Diana Gabaldon critiques historians for their presumption of understanding historical events. She suggests that their interpretations are often shaped by limited evidence and preconceived notions, leading to a filtered view of the past that may not reflect reality. Most historians rely on the artifacts and documents that survive, which may obscure the true essence of historical events.

Gabaldon's observation highlights the struggle of historians to uncover genuine truths while grappling with the incomplete narratives left behind. Their interpretations, shaped by societal influences and expectations, can create a smokescreen that distorts understanding. It is a rare historian who is able to see beyond these constraints to grasp what truly transpired in history.