This quote underscores the fundamental nature of power dynamics and leadership. In any societal or organizational context, the exercise of authority often involves a choice: to collaborate equitably with others or to dominate them completely. When leaders opt to rule side by side, they foster an environment of mutual respect, cooperation, and shared responsibility. This approach tends to lead to more stable and sustainable relationships, as it values the contributions of all parties involved. Conversely, the alternative—being subdued entirely—implies a coercive or oppressive approach, where power is exerted forcefully and opposition is silenced or vanquished. Such methods may achieve short-term compliance but often result in resentment, rebellion, and ultimately instability. Reflecting on these options, one might consider the importance of balanced leadership—where authority is exercised with justice, empathy, and inclusiveness. Historically, civilizations and organizations that have thrived are those that embraced collaborative ruling practices, fostering loyalty and a sense of shared purpose. On the other hand, regimes or leaders who rely solely on subjugation tend to breed resistance and destructive cycles of conflict.

This quote also invites personal introspection about how power is wielded in everyday life. Whether in personal relationships, workplaces, or larger societal structures, the principles remain consistent. The choice between partnership and dominance influences the long-term health and harmony of the community. As people, understanding this dichotomy can guide us to lead with integrity, emphasizing dialogue and mutual empowerment rather than control and suppression.