Professor Sengupta had the self-satisfied habit common to many academics of pretending an intellectual equality with his audience in order to happily demonstrate his own superiority.
Professor Sengupta exemplifies a common trait among academics where he feigns intellectual equality with his audience, which serves to highlight his own superior knowledge and understanding. This behavior suggests a certain arrogance, as he seems to take pleasure in showcasing his intellect, perhaps at the expense of those he addresses.
This dynamic between the professor and his audience can create a barrier to genuine communication, as it shifts the focus from shared learning to the professor's self-aggrandizement. Such an approach may alienate listeners rather than foster an engaging and inclusive exchange of ideas.
