The compensation issue in some ways echoed Jobs's parking quirk. He refused such trappings as having a "Reserved for CEO" spot, but he assumed for himself the right to park in the handicapped spaces. He wanted to be seen {both by himself and by others} as someone willing to work for $1 a year, but he also wanted to have huge stock grants bestowed upon him. Jangling inside him were the contradictions of a counterculture rebel turned business entrepreneur, someone who wanted to believe that he had turned on and tuned in without having sold out and cashed in.
The compensation dilemma surrounding Steve Jobs reflected his complex personality. He declined traditional perks like a reserved parking space for CEOs but often took advantage of handicapped spots, showcasing a contradiction between his self-image and actions. Jobs aimed to be perceived as a minimalist, claiming he worked for just a dollar annually while simultaneously accepting substantial stock grants, which highlighted his inconsistent values.
This tension in Jobs's character illustrated his struggle between his rebellious roots and the corporate world. He wanted to maintain an image of authenticity and counterculture while simultaneously benefiting from the financial rewards of a successful entrepreneur. This duality made him a unique figure in the business landscape, embodying both a commitment to ideals and a desire for wealth.