This quote delivers a sharp critique wrapped in humor about the often overestimated influence of experts, specifically economists, on complex systems like the economy. It highlights the unpredictability and inherent complexity of economic phenomena, suggesting that despite economists' analyses and forecasts, the actual outcomes and state of the economy unfold with a level of independence that can make expert predictions seem peripheral or even irrelevant. The clever analogy to weather and weather forecasters underscores the idea that even the best predictions in inherently chaotic systems have limited control or influence. Economists, like weather forecasters, can provide insights based on models, data, and experience, but ultimately, forces beyond their control play significant roles. This perspective invites a bit of humility about our reliance on experts and models, reminding us that human systems — whether economic or meteorological — possess intrinsic uncertainties. It does not dismiss the importance of economists altogether but instead points toward the complexity and dynamism of the economy that resist complete domination by theory or prediction. It serves as a pragmatic reflection on the limits of expertise, the unpredictable nature of real-world dynamics, and the need to balance faith in expert advice with awareness of its limitations. Additionally, it provokes a thoughtful conversation about how we trust and interpret predictions in various fields and challenges the assumption that subjects managed by professionals are fully controllable or foreseeable.