This quote presents an intriguing paradox that highlights the contrast between cleverness and practical skill or execution. It seems to play on the irony where someone is intellectually clever yet fails at a particular task, in this case, shooting. Conversely, it points to someone else who might not be considered very intelligent as a person but is proficient at shooting. This juxtaposition challenges conventional associations between intelligence and competence.

The underlying message could be interpreted in several ways. First, it acknowledges that intelligence does not always translate into success in specific, practical domains. Being book-smart or clever doesn't guarantee skillfulness or effectiveness where practical, real-world actions are concerned. At the same time, it suggests that people who might not be highly intellectual or academically inclined can excel in particular areas due to focus, practice, or innate talent.

This quote can also serve as a commentary on the limits of logic itself. The assertion "That's LOGIC!" is almost sarcastic, implying that what we often deem rational or logical doesn't always hold true in real life. It points to the complexity of human abilities and the multifaceted nature of intelligence, pushing readers to appreciate the diversity in skill sets and types of ‘cleverness.’

In a broader sense, this quote encourages reflection on how we evaluate success and intelligence in society. It invites us to reconsider our judgments about others and understand that competence in one area doesn’t necessarily mean overall intelligence, and vice versa. The balance between intellect and practical ability is nuanced, and the quote humorously captures this tension.